About Us
EU/US Relations
EU: Global Player
Publications
Press Room
For Youth

  Breaking News
  More Breaking News
  News Releases
  Speeches/Press
  Conferences
  Hot Topics
  Press Team
  Press Packs
  Media Calendar
  EU in the Media
  Quicklinks
Subscribe to
EU NewsBriefs:
EU E-Alert Service




News Release


Pascal Lamy

No. 34/03
May 7, 2003

FOREIGN SALES CORPORATIONS:
FOLLOWING WTO AUTHORIZATION TO APPLY COUNTERMEASURES OF UP TO $4 BILLION, EU EXPECTS US TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH WTO RULES BEFORE THE BEGINNING OF NEXT YEAR
 

Today, the WTO Dispute Settlement Body authorized the EU to increase customs duties up to the level of 100%, for a total of $4 billion of US Trade. This move clears the way for the EU to impose counter-measures to be applied on a detailed list of products notified to the DSB. EU Trade Commissioner Pascal Lamy said: "I am encouraged by the determination of the US Administration and Congressional leaders to ensure repeal of FSC/ETI during the course of the current fiscal year. I also trust that any solution found by the US will be fully compatible with WTO rules. The Commission will review the situation in the autumn, and if there is no sign that compliance is on the way at that time, it would then start the legislative procedure for the adoption of countermeasures by 1 January 2004."  

The EU request for authorization to apply countermeasures included a detailed list of products on which countermeasures may be applied. This list was prepared following extensive consultations with EU economic operators and member states, which started last September.

Under WTO rules, the US had an obligation to ensure compliance by November 2000. Furthermore, the EU has been entitled to retaliate since August 2002, date when the WTO arbitrator fixed the amount of countermeasures to which the EU is entitled. The EU has, however, avoided any immediate recourse to retaliation so as to give a reasonable time for the US Administration and Congress to adopt the necessary legislation for the repeal of FSC(ETI). The authorization granted by the WTO today allows the EU to preserve its rights to impose countermeasures if FSC/ETI is not repealed by the end of this fiscal year.

Background  

The history of this case goes back to 1971 to the Domestic International Sales Corporation (DISC) scheme, which was declared an illegal export subsidy by a GATT panel in 1976 (the panel ruling was adopted in 1981). The US replaced the DISC scheme with the Foreign Sales Corporation (FSC) scheme in 1984. At the time the EU contested the legality of the FSC but did not pursue it due to the opening of the Uruguay Round trade negotiations.  

Following further complaints by EU companies, and in view of the increasing amount of FSC subsidies being granted by the US, the EU resumed bilateral contacts with the US in 1997. Since no progress was made, the EU requested a WTO panel to pronounce itself on the dispute. The Panel in its report of October 1999, found the FSC to constitute an illegal export subsidy under both the Subsidies Agreement and (in relation to agricultural products) the Agriculture Agreement.  

The US appealed against the Panel Ruling but the Appellate Body confirmed the panel findings on the illegality of the FSC scheme. The US was then given until 1 October 2000 (extended to 1 November 2000) to withdraw the FSC scheme.  

In an effort to comply, on 15 November 2000, President Clinton signed the FSC Replacement Act (ETI Act) into law. The ETI Act, however, did not modify the substance of the export subsidy scheme and as a result on 17 November 2000, the EU launched a further Panel on compliance and at the same time presented a request for countermeasures for an amount of US $4,043 million. While the compliance panel was established in December 2000, it was agreed that, during the compliance procedure, the arbitration procedure on the amount of countermeasures would be suspended and that it would be automatically reactivated upon adoption by the WTO of the Appellate Body's findings.  

On 20 August 2001, the WTO compliance panel examining the ETI Act issued its report in full support of the EU. In particular, the panel found that the ETI Act also constituted a prohibited export subsidy under WTO rules. The US appealed but in January 2002 the WTO Appellate Body once more confirmed the panel findings.  

Consequently, on 28 January 2002 the panel and Appellate Body reports were adopted and the arbitration procedure was reactivated. The report of the arbitrators was issued at the end of August 2002 and endorses the EU request for countermeasures for a level of US $4,043 million. The DSB has now authorized the EU to apply countermeasures up to that level.  

The list of products can be found at:
http://mkaccdb.eu.int/dsu/doc/ds108-26.doc

The exact description of the products can be found at:
http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/archive/2002/l_29020021028en.html
(OJ L290 of 28 October 2002)

For further information see:
IP/01/1214, IP/00/1321, MEMO/00/84, IP/00/1094 and IP/00/186

DG TRADE websites:
http://europa.eu.int/comm/trade/miti/dispute/wn.htm
http://mkaccdb.eu.int/miti/dsu

Press Contacts:

Willy Hélin
202-862-9530

Wilfried Schneider
202-862-9523



Back to top

Printer Friendly  





European Union - Delegation of the European Commission to the United States
2300 M Street, NW, Washington, DC 20037
Telephone: (202) 862-9500 Fax: (202) 429-1766